Investigating Science 11–12 · Year 11

A draining bottle: testing a mathematical model and refining it

Module 3: Scientific Models

Practical, model not builtLow risk

This site has no interactive model of its own. Where a step or a material names a Concept Studio model, simulation or tool, it has not been built; an external simulation a step names (for example PhET) is not part of this site.

The idea

A mathematical model predicts how the water level in a draining container falls; testing it against a real bottle shows where the ideal model fails and how one measured constant repairs it.

What you need

  • a straight-sided clear container 10.0 cm in internal diameter (a length of acrylic pipe with a capped base, or a straight-sided bottle) with a 4.0 mm hole drilled in the centre of the base by the teacher
  • ruler taped vertically with zero at the hole, phone to video the level, stopwatch, water, a tray or sink

How to do it

  1. Fill to 20.0 cm above the hole with a finger over the hole.
  2. Release and film the level falling; read the height every 10 s from the video.
  3. Repeat three times.
  4. Plot √h against time; the model predicts a straight line.
  5. Calculate the ideal drain time from the model and compare with the measured time; find the discharge coefficient C_d = t_ideal / t_measured.
  6. Use the fitted model to predict the drain time from 10.0 cm, then test the prediction.

What you should see

Torricelli’s law v = √(2gh) with an area ratio (100/4.0)² = 625 predicts an initial jet speed of 1.98 m/s and an ideal drain time from 20.0 cm of t = 625 √(2 × 0.200/9.80) = 126 s. The real container takes longer because the jet narrows as it exits a sharp-edged hole; the learner’s √h against t plot is still straight, so the square-root law holds and only the constant needs fitting. A fitted C_d of 0.61, for example, gives 207 s; with C_d fitted, the model predicts the 10.0 cm drain time (t ∝ √h₀, so 0.707 of the 20 cm time), which the learner then tests against their timing uncertainty.

What changes

What you change
starting height (and hole size in an extension)
What you measure
water height against time and total drain time
What you keep the same
  • same container and hole
  • container vertical
  • same water temperature
  • three trials per height

Common misconceptions

Each of these ideas is wrong, and the activity is a chance to test it.

  • Water drains at a steady rate.
  • If a model’s number is wrong the whole model is useless.
  • A bigger container drains faster because more water pushes down.

Safety card

Low riskLearners carry it out

Hazards

  • water spills
  • sharp edges on the drilled hole

Controls

  • drain into a sink or tray
  • teacher drills and deburrs the hole in advance

Note

No hazardous chemicals or heat sources: record the activity in the school's RiskAssess risk assessment, following the NSW Department of Education Science safety and compliance page; the Chemical Safety in Schools package is not triggered.

Curriculum references

The NSW syllabus outcomes and Australian Curriculum v9 codes this activity supports. They are references, not a verified or complete curriculum alignment.

Sources

The pages the author read to write this activity.

  1. www.nsw.gov.au/education-and-training/nesa/curriculum/science/investigating-science-stage-6-2017
  2. instructional-resources.physics.uiowa.edu/2c1010-three-hole-can-experiment-velocity-efflux
  3. instructional-resources.physics.uiowa.edu/2c1026-water-syringe-velocity-efflux

All Concept Studio activities